In fast food restaurants & food courts you typically see a whole range of different drink sizes but often those retailers question offering the extreme size drinks because sales of them are relatively low. However, research from Duke University has suggested that drink purchases are altered by the portfolio of options available, and operators may be missing the role of the extreme sizes.

What the research showed was that customers who purchased a 16oz drink when a 12oz was available, later chose a 21oz when the 12oz was removed because where the 12oz was previously the “small” when its removed the 16oz becomes “small”.  So people think more about the size of the drink relative to the other options than its absolute size. Continuing this pattern at the other end of the scale, people who purchased a 21oz drink (when 32oz was the largest), moved up to a 32oz drink when a 44oz drink was introduced.

So by adding (or subtracting) sizes at the extreme ends of the portfolio its possible to shift the demand curve because people think more in terms of small, medium & large than what the actual sizes are.  Of course the next question is how this influences price perception, which the study did not touch on.

Source: University of Chicago Press Journals

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
The Conflict Between Cognitive Abilities: Understanding the Trade-Offs

The Conflict Between Cognitive Abilities: Understanding the Trade-Offs

New research reveals a surprising conflict between implicit statistical learning and executive functions, highlighting a trade-off between these cognitive abilities. Implicit statistical learning involves detecting patterns unconsciously, while executive functions encompass high-level processes like decision-making and problem-solving. The study found that individuals excelling in executive functions often struggle with implicit learning, suggesting a competitive interaction between these cognitive systems. This insight challenges traditional views of cognitive abilities as isolated strengths and underscores the need for balanced educational and professional strategies to optimize learning and performance.

The Human Brain’s Preference for Learning from Liked Individuals

The Human Brain’s Preference for Learning from Liked Individuals

Recent research reveals that our brains are hardwired to learn more effectively from people we like. This preference is linked to the brain’s reward system, which becomes more active when receiving information from favored individuals. This discovery has significant implications for education and training, suggesting that positive relationships between educators and learners can enhance the learning process. By fostering trust and empathy, educators can create more engaging and effective learning environments. This insight emphasizes the importance of social connections in cognitive development and learning efficiency.

The Illusion of Knowledge: How Repetition Shapes Our Beliefs

The Illusion of Knowledge: How Repetition Shapes Our Beliefs

Our beliefs can be easily influenced by repetition. A recent study published in Cognition reveals how repeated exposure to statements can create an illusion of knowledge, making us believe we knew the information all along. This “truth effect” exploits our brain’s processing fluency, leading us to trust familiar information more, regardless of its accuracy. In a digital age rife with misinformation, understanding this cognitive bias is crucial for making informed decisions and resisting false beliefs. Discover how repetition shapes our perceptions and what we can do to combat the illusion of knowledge.

Unlocking the Pricing Puzzle: The Power of Weber’s Law

Unlocking the Pricing Puzzle: The Power of Weber’s Law

Discover the power of Weber’s Law in setting effective pricing strategies. This blog post unravels how small, incremental changes in price or product variables, guided by this 19th-century principle, can subtly influence consumer behaviour and enhance business profitability. It’s time to focus on the differences that truly make a difference.