In fast food restaurants & food courts you typically see a whole range of different drink sizes but often those retailers question offering the extreme size drinks because sales of them are relatively low. However, research from Duke University has suggested that drink purchases are altered by the portfolio of options available, and operators may be missing the role of the extreme sizes.

What the research showed was that customers who purchased a 16oz drink when a 12oz was available, later chose a 21oz when the 12oz was removed because where the 12oz was previously the “small” when its removed the 16oz becomes “small”.  So people think more about the size of the drink relative to the other options than its absolute size. Continuing this pattern at the other end of the scale, people who purchased a 21oz drink (when 32oz was the largest), moved up to a 32oz drink when a 44oz drink was introduced.

So by adding (or subtracting) sizes at the extreme ends of the portfolio its possible to shift the demand curve because people think more in terms of small, medium & large than what the actual sizes are.  Of course the next question is how this influences price perception, which the study did not touch on.

Source: University of Chicago Press Journals

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Unlocking the Pricing Puzzle: The Power of Weber’s Law

Unlocking the Pricing Puzzle: The Power of Weber’s Law

Discover the power of Weber’s Law in setting effective pricing strategies. This blog post unravels how small, incremental changes in price or product variables, guided by this 19th-century principle, can subtly influence consumer behaviour and enhance business profitability. It’s time to focus on the differences that truly make a difference.

The Trifecta of Choice: Why Offering Three Options Works and How Culture and Age Play a Part

The Trifecta of Choice: Why Offering Three Options Works and How Culture and Age Play a Part

In the intricate dance of decision-making, the magic number often seems to be three. A trio of options offers a harmonious blend of variety without overwhelming our cognitive processes. But as with many aspects of human behaviour, this seemingly universal ‘rule of three’ dances to different tunes across cultures and generations. Dive in as we explore why three choices strike a chord and how cultural and age nuances can subtly change the melody