opensmokingbooth 03

OK I know smoking is a bad habit but the simple fact is that many people still smoke. In airports this becomes a bit of an issue, particularly transit airports. The typical smoking rooms are nothing short of disgusting and whilst smokers may arguably be ill-concerned about their health, we really don’t want to kill them off by forcing them to go into these areas.

A little while ago I featured the new smoking room at Capetown Airport, which is designed to give smokers somewhere to go which isn’t stressful & horrid – and hence keeps them in the mood to shop.

Recently designer D.K. Wei came up with a new design for a smoking booth in airports which could easily be put into baggage claim areas as well as Departures area. Its not a mass smoking room but rather designed for a couple of people at most – so you’d have a few of them.

The design really is quite revolutionary. When the system starts, the smoke is filtered by an arm which also generates low pressure air around the smoker. A “wall” (the transition between low & high air pressure) keeps smoke within a 360 degree bubble around the smoker. The smoking space is therefore basically an invisible spherical “air wall” through which travellers can walk conveniently in and out of whilst keeping the smoke in and filtering it.

Open Smoking Booth is I.D. Magazine’s Annual Design Review 2009 winner.

opensmokingbooth 01

opensmokingbooth 02

opensmokingbooth 04

Read More ....

People at the same meeting paying attention to different details of a shared event

The Unreliable Witness

We tend to think memory is where our account of an event becomes unreliable. But the process begins earlier. Attention is selective, perception is incomplete, and two people can experience the same event while noticing very different things.

The data is good. The model is sound. And the decision still doesn't hold the way it should. The problem isn't the analysis. It's what the analysis assumes about the stability of the world it's describing.

Deciding Under Constraint

The data is good. The model is sound. And the decision still doesn’t hold the way it should. The problem isn’t the analysis. It’s what the analysis assumes about the stability of the world it’s describing.